In a significant legal development, Prabir Purkayastha, Editor-in-chief of NewsClick, along with Amit Chakravarty, the HR head, have approached the Delhi High Court, seeking the dismissal of an FIR filed against them by the Delhi Police’s special cell. This FIR, registered under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, has accused NewsClick of receiving funds for allegedly promoting pro-China propaganda.
A Call for Legal Redress
The legal battle initiated by Prabir Purkayastha and Amit Chakravarty revolves around the FIR that has been a subject of controversy. The Delhi Police’s special cell filed this FIR, invoking the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, which carries significant legal implications. The allegations within the FIR suggest that NewsClick received financial support in connection with purported pro-China propaganda activities.
Urgent Hearing and Legal Arguments
Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing the accused, expedited the legal proceedings by seeking an urgent hearing. Sibal argued that the arrest made in this case was conducted unlawfully and in contravention of Supreme Court decisions. Consequently, the Delhi High Court has agreed to hear the case on the upcoming Friday.
Access to FIR Granted by Trial Court
In a separate development, a trial court recently directed the Delhi Police to provide Prabir Purkayastha and Amit Chakravarty with a copy of the FIR. This decision cited previous court orders affirming the right of the accused to access this crucial document. The court’s directive ensures transparency and adherence to established legal procedures.
Opposition from Special Public Prosecutor
During these legal proceedings, the special public prosecutor opposed the applications for access to the FIR, citing the sensitive nature of the case and emphasizing that the investigation is still in its initial stages. The prosecutor underscored the alleged offenses attributed to the accused, including the receipt of ₹115 crore in the guise of foreign funding and involvement in discussions related to a map of India that omitted Kashmir and depicted Arunachal Pradesh as a disputed area.
As this legal battle unfolds, it highlights the significance of due process and the judicial system in addressing complex and contentious matters. The outcome of this case will be closely watched, as it pertains to issues of free speech, media freedom, and legal accountability.
