Shah Rukh Khan’s upcoming film, Dunki, has found itself amidst a social media storm, with claims circulating that the film’s latest poster subtly expresses solidarity with Palestine. However, a closer look reveals that this speculation is not grounded in reality. In this fact-check, we dissect the controversy surrounding Dunki’s poster and unveil the truth behind the alleged support for Palestine.
The rumors gained momentum after the release of the first song from Dunki, titled “Lutt Putt Gaya,” along with the accompanying poster. Observers noted a flag featuring red, black, and white borders, leading to assumptions that it symbolizes support for Palestine, a country grappling with Israel’s terror threat. Many even took to expressing gratitude to Shah Rukh Khan for purportedly standing in solidarity with Palestine. However, the reality is quite different. The flag in question is that of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), not Palestine, debunking the baseless speculations.
Moving beyond the controversy, Dunki itself unfolds a narrative centered on the illegal immigration struggles of four friends portrayed by Vicky Kaushal and Taapsee Pannu, residing in Punjab. Their dream of reaching London becomes entangled in the complexities of inadequate documentation. Rajkumar Hirani, the filmmaker, takes the audience on an emotional journey with these characters, promising a film that will resonate deeply.
An interesting facet of Dunki is its production on the most economical budget ever. Reports indicate that the film was crafted with a mere $10 million, shot over a span of 75 days. Remarkably, Shah Rukh Khan allocated 60 days of his schedule to contribute to the film. The movie is set to hit the screens on December 21, 2033, generating eager anticipation among fans eagerly awaiting Shah Rukh Khan’s latest cinematic offering. Notably, the film also features Boman Irani in a pivotal role and is slated to clash with Prabhas’ “Saalar” at the box office.
As the controversy surrounding Dunki’s poster is clarified, the film emerges not only as a promising cinematic experience but also a testament to frugal filmmaking, challenging the conventional norms of big-budget productions.
