The telecommunications and technology industries have voiced their opinions regarding the concept of selective app banning proposed by the Department of Telecommunications (DoT). The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) initiated a consultation paper on the idea of selectively banning specific applications. This approach aims to grant the government the capability to restrict access to particular apps, such as WhatsApp, in specific geographical regions when deemed necessary for national security interests. Telecom players, represented by the Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI), have suggested bringing messaging services under regulated licenses, allowing for controlled access to messaging apps like WhatsApp and Telegram.
Telecoms’ Revenue Share Argument
Telcos have reiterated their long-standing argument for a share of the revenue generated by internet-based messaging and calling services. They contend that they invest significantly in building and maintaining their networks, incurring associated costs to facilitate the traffic generated by apps like WhatsApp, which enable users to make voice calls and send texts.
Consumer Adaptability and Alternatives
Critics of the concept of selective app banning have raised concerns that users are highly resourceful and adaptive. Even if specific apps were to be banned selectively, consumers could readily find alternative means of communication. This adaptability could undermine the intended objectives of the government’s selective banning strategy. Critics argue that while such bans might temporarily disrupt the usage of a particular app, they are unlikely to have a significant and lasting impact.
Challenges of Internet Bans
Internet bans, as previously experienced in certain regions, pose considerable challenges to the general public. These bans often hinder basic activities such as bill payments, ride bookings, and more. In contrast, the concept of selectively banning apps appears to offer a more tailored approach. However, the concerns voiced by critics suggest that consumers’ ability to find alternative communication channels could undermine the efficacy of such selective bans.
The ongoing discourse surrounding selective app banning reflects the complex landscape of modern communication and technology. While the government may seek to exercise control over certain apps for national security reasons, the resourcefulness of consumers in finding alternative communication methods poses a significant challenge. As discussions on this issue continue, striking a balance between security concerns and the adaptability of technology users remains a central point of contention. The telecommunications and tech industries, along with regulatory bodies, will likely play a crucial role in shaping the future of app access and usage in India.
